{{ heroEyebrow }}

You shipped it. People are using it. Are you sure you can see what's actually working?

Once people are using your product, Zagnetism audits every outcome it claims, shows you what's genuinely working and what's quietly broken, and names the one fix that moves the metric.

So you improve the right thing, not the loud thing. Every call is checked against your own records, so you can trust it.

signup conversion · last 30d gap detected
82% 61% the gap
What the app says
What actually happened
What a lying number costs you

You're losing customers and money right now, and your tools are telling you everything is fine.

The most expensive failures don't throw an error. The app fires a success event, the number ticks up, everyone is happy, and the real thing never happened. Nobody gets paged.

You find out weeks later, when growth is mysteriously flat. By then the trail has gone cold, because the trail itself was lying.

A lying number isn't a data problem. It's a decision problem. You spend your next month fixing the wrong thing.

The plain version

Picture a restaurant where the order screen marks every table “served.” The owner sees a perfect night, while customers sit at empty tables and walk out.

Zagnetism is the floor manager who actually walks the room and checks that the plate reached the table.

Happening this week, in tools you already trust

Your metrics say it worked. Did it?

Every popular tool measures what the browser did. Not what actually became true.

These are good tools, and Zagnetism reads from them. They just all drink from the same well: the client-side signal the app fires the instant it thinks it succeeded. None of them check that claim against your own records. Pick a journey and see the gap.

{{ active.showHeadline }} {{ active.tool }}
{{ active.claimValue }} {{ active.claimSub }}
but actually
{{ active.realValue }} {{ active.realLabel }}

{{ active.realityBody }}

so we name the one fix
The one fix

{{ active.fix }}

After you ship, we confirm it actually moved the number.

Sentry tells you when your code broke. Zagnetism tells you when nothing broke but the number is still lying.

no error · no alert · attention goes elsewhere
Works with the stack you already run

The layer that connects your signals and checks them against the truth.

Your replay, analytics, and error tools each see one slice of what your app says happened. Your database knows what actually happened. Nobody reconciles the two.

Zagnetism is that layer. It reads the signals you already produce, checks every success claim against your own records, and turns the gap into one verified fix. You keep your stack. We make its numbers trustworthy.

What the app says
Replay
LogRocket, FullStory
Analytics
PostHog, Amplitude
Errors
Sentry, Datadog
What actually happened
Your records
read-only views you control
Zagnetism
the audit + action layer
1  reconcile claim vs. truth
confirmed real
proven false
can't check yet
2  name the one fix
3  verify it moved the number
A number you trust
checked against records
The one fix
named, then verified

Works with what you run. Connects to LogRocket, PostHog, Sentry, and Amplitude, plus your own database or warehouse. Nothing to rip out.

Read-only, by design. We read through read-only views you control. We never need your database keys.

Independent. The truth is a separate input, never the tool being audited. An auditor can't grade itself.

The loop, in four plain beats · this is JourneyOps
{{ b.num }}

{{ b.title }}

{{ b.body }}

And when there's no way to verify an outcome, we say so. “Can't be checked yet” is a real, honest answer, instead of inventing confidence. That candor is the product.

Sentry catches the loud failures. Zagnetism catches the silent ones, from the same signals.

What “prove it” looks like

We check each step against your own records, and give it one of three plain answers.

activation: new team reaches first value
Reported 82%  ·  Real 61%
{{ active2.verdictFull }}

{{ active2.label }}

What the app says happened
{{ active2.claimed }}
What your own records show
{{ active2.truth }}
{{ active2.glyph }}

{{ active2.reason }}

Why you can believe us

The whole pitch is “you can trust this.” So the proof has to be airtight.

{{ p.num }}

{{ p.title }}

{{ p.body }}

Who it's for

Built for the person who owns the number.

You bought all the tools and still can't get a straight answer.

Product and growth owners at seed-to-Series-A teams who live and die by activation and conversion, already run LogRocket or PostHog, and have nobody whose job is to check whether those numbers are real.

Not a monitoring tool. Not pitched to on-call engineering. This is for the person who has to make the call on what's working.

Taking a small number of design partners

Find out which of your numbers you can trust.

We'll establish trustworthy measurement on your real journeys, founder to founder, then keep watching. Start with your single most important journey.

What to expect: we set up trustworthy measurement on one journey with you, founder to founder. No dashboards to wire up yourself.

Zagnetism JourneyOps · trust the number.
© 2026 Zagnetism
Design-partner application

Let's find out if your activation number is real.

We're onboarding a small number of seed to Series A product teams. Founder-led, high touch. We do the measurement setup with you, then the loop runs on top.

{{ x }}

Request received.

Thanks, {{ eaFirstName }}. We read every application ourselves. If your journeys look like a fit, you'll hear from a founder within two business days.

Which tools are you already running?
{{ eaError }}
We read every application ourselves.

Welcome back

Sign in to your Zagnetism Pulse workspace.

A secure sign-in link is on its way to

{{ loginEmail }}

{{ loginError }}

New here?